Imagine a world where artists don’t have to choose between their passion and paying the bills. Sounds like a dream, right? Well, in Ireland, it’s already a reality. But here’s where it gets controversial: should Scotland—or any other country—follow suit and provide artists with a basic income? Let’s dive into this bold idea and explore why it’s sparking both hope and debate.
The Struggle is Real
Meet Kirsty McArthur, a Glasgow-based artist who, like many freelancers, juggles her creative work with side gigs to make ends meet. Teaching art workshops? Check. Hospitality jobs? Check. Burnout? Constantly looming. At 29, Kirsty’s story isn’t unique. Unions and experts warn that low pay, inconsistent work, and the soaring cost of living are pushing many artists to the brink. So, what’s the solution?
Enter the Basic Income for the Arts
Scotland is now considering a radical idea: paying artists directly through a basic income scheme. Inspired by Ireland’s groundbreaking program, this approach could be a game-changer. But how does it work? In Ireland, 2,000 artists—musicians, painters, comedians, and more—received €1,300 (£1,134) monthly with no strings attached. The results? Artists reported being happier, more focused on their craft, and less reliant on non-artistic jobs.
A Life-Changing Opportunity
Take Brían Ó Súilleabháin, a 29-year-old actor who quit his day job at a wine shop when he was selected for Ireland’s pilot scheme. ‘It was life-changing,’ he says. With the basic income as a safety net, he could take risks and pursue acting full-time. ‘If you give money to an artist, they will make art,’ he adds. And the numbers back him up: for every €1 invested, the scheme contributed €1.39 to the economy through savings, social impacts, and tax revenue.
But Here’s the Catch
While Ireland’s program was made permanent in 2025, it’s not expanding rapidly. ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day,’ says Irish Culture Minister Patrick O’Donovan. Scotland, meanwhile, is at a crossroads. With public finances tight, some question whether this is the best use of taxpayer money. And this is the part most people miss: without such support, Scotland risks losing new voices, fresh ideas, and its cultural vibrancy.
The Cultural Ripple Effect
Scottish National Poet Peter MacKay, who began his career in Ireland, believes a basic income would enrich Scotland’s cultural life in ways we can’t yet imagine. ‘New novels, new music, new art—it’s all possible,’ he says. Donald Shaw, director of the Celtic Connections festival, warns that without action, Scottish culture could become a ‘very dry desert.’
What’s Next?
Scotland’s Culture Secretary Angus Robertson is ‘looking into’ the idea, but with an election looming, major decisions are on hold. Meanwhile, artists like Kirsty hope for a future where creativity isn’t stifled by financial stress. ‘Glasgow’s best painters and filmmakers are stuck working in pubs for minimum wage,’ she says. ‘A basic income would benefit everyone.’
Your Turn to Weigh In
Is a basic income for artists a brilliant investment in culture, or a risky use of public funds? Should Scotland take the leap, or is this a luxury it can’t afford? Let’s spark a conversation—share your thoughts in the comments!
